Microsoft Azure Arc

What differentiates Microsoft Azure Arc from other similar products?

I like Microsoft Azure because of its simplicity. It provides all the required cloud infrastructure services such as Compute, Network, Storage, etc. We can easily migrate our on-premises application to Azure using the help of Solution Architects and with Azure Migration Tool. It is a highly reliable and scalable solution by Microsoft. It is capable of storing petabytes of data, create virtual machines for any OS, and using of emerging technologies such as NLP, AI, ML, etc.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

1) Customer support and services are really fantastic. 2) Provides a wide range of cloud services. 3) Pricing model is too good and easily understood by the customers. 4) Highly scalable and secured services. 5) Azure regions are available in almost all the nearby locations to save costs.

What do you dislike most about this product?

1) Sometimes it takes a lot of time to deploy any new service. 2) Some services require higher internet bandwidth. 3) Cost optimization is required for using some specialized services such as AI/ML. 4) Overall deployment cost for the small and mid-sized organizations.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

I highly recommended the solution for any prospective buyers. It has all the features and services in a unified place.

What differentiates Microsoft Azure Arc from other similar products?

Following things are key differentiator for Microsoft Azure: - Very good documentation - Depth and breadth of cloud services - Cost effective serverless solutions - Second most used cloud provider

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Being a .NET developer I started my cloud journey with Azure. I loved the way Azure makes it easy to deploy .NET based applications to cloud and how seamlessly it has been integrated in Visual Studio.

What do you dislike most about this product?

Nothing to dislike, but Azure can work towards building more affordable compute solutions so that individuals can afford without thinking much about cost.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Go with Microsoft Azure if you are planning to migrate your on-premises workload. You don't have to worry about scaling needs of your application. You can build highly available, scalable solutions with Azure and can also implement disaster recovery strategies for your business critical applications.

What differentiates Microsoft Azure Arc from other similar products?

When constructing a system as a backbone in Azure, it is utilized as a backup. There are several backup options for the system, but with Azure, this service is the most convenient since it can be managed centrally through Azure Portal. It's great that all backup and restoration logs can be examined instantly, that no commands or scripts are necessary, and that setup can be done simply by using the user interface.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

There is no need to size extra drives because the backup destination is likewise in Azure. The backup system's prior architecture appears to be ineffective. Backup was designed to be used as a safe, therefore. We can now operate our crucial systems with confidence. Furthermore, no installation is required, and installation administration is straightforward.

What do you dislike most about this product?

I'm now preserving a specific quantity of Backup history since I don't know the optimization, such as Backup retention period. (It is more expensive.) To what degree is data retained on Azure, and how much backup is required?

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

The major purpose is to be able to make Backup in a safe manner. I am pleased since it satisfies the bare minimum. Today, we can run our critical systems with confidence. Furthermore, no installation is necessary, and installation administration is simple. Simply changing the destination will allow you to restore the backup data to a fresh virtual machine during the failure investigation.