Optimize Jail Management Systems: Navigating the Vendor Landscape for Future-Ready Compliance
Empowering justice systems with compliant, secure, and scalable solutions.
Governments encounter multiple challenges when selecting JMSs that address both immediate and future needs:
- Navigating diverse features and complex regulations complicates the process of identifying the ideal JMS vendor.
- Facilities must balance urgent operational requirements with planning for future scalability and compliance.
- Budget limitations often restrict the ability to invest in long-term, value-focused solutions, adding pressure to the decision-making process.
- Integrating new JMS solutions with existing systems creates operational challenges that can impact efficiency and workflow continuity.
Our Advice
Critical Insight
Government agencies face the challenge of selecting JMSs that can adapt to evolving regulations, operate within budget constraints, and scale for future needs. A strategic choice of a JMS is a valuable investment in public safety, as a system that balances efficiency, security, and compliance enables agencies to effectively meet growing operational demands while mitigating long-term risks and costs.
Impact and Result
- Adopt a comprehensive approach to vendor comparison by thoroughly evaluating each JMS option for efficiency, scalability, and regulatory compliance, ensuring alignment with both operational and budgetary goals.
- Establish a forward-looking strategy to select a solution capable of addressing immediate facility needs while remaining adaptable to future requirements, supporting sustainable growth.
- Implement a structured evaluation framework that minimizes risk by streamlining the selection process, reinforcing safety standards, and achieving compliance with global regulations.
Optimize Jail Management Systems: Navigating the Vendor Landscape for Future-Ready Compliance
Empowering justice systems with compliant, secure, and scalable solutions.
Analyst perspective
Enabling secure and efficient jail management choices.
IT leaders confront an essential decision when choosing a jail management system that will greatly influence the overall justice system. These systems are crucial for public safety efforts, guaranteeing that key processes function effectively and safely. This choice affects adherence to regulations, operational efficiency, and general public safety. Our methodology provides a comprehensive vendor landscape that surpasses simple comparisons. In a saturated IT market filled with many alternatives all asserting excellence, we provide a strategic, comprehensive evaluation that examines the advantages, drawbacks, and sustainability of every solution. This guarantees that the chosen system fulfills both current and future needs. By conducting a thorough analysis of the vendor landscape, we ensure that the selected solution adheres to regulations, enhances operational efficiency, and maintains security standards, fulfilling client requirements both currently and in the future. The Jail Management System Vendor Shortlist Tool enables IT leaders to make informed, strategic choices that improve jail management systems, aiding wider justice system goals like boosting public trust, lowering expenses, and guaranteeing enduring value from technology investments. Choosing the appropriate system is an essential initial action for a safer, more efficient future.
Vidhi Trivedi
Research Analyst, Industry
Info-Tech Research Group
Executive summary
Your Challenge
Governments face the challenge of selecting jail management systems (JMS) that meet immediate needs and long-term goals:
- Selecting the right vendor: The variety of features and regulations complicates the process of choosing a JMS.
- Balancing short- and long-term goals: Facilities must address urgent needs while planning for future growth and adherence to regulations.
- Budget constraints: Limited resources challenge the ability to select long-term, value-oriented systems.
- System integration: Integrating new systems with existing infrastructure poses operational challenges.
Common Obstacles
Government IT leaders face several key obstacles when choosing a JMS:
- Adapting to global regulations: Systems must evolve alongside shifting legal standards.
- Preparing for the future: Solutions must remain relevant as technologies and requirements change.
- Seamless integration: Efficient integration with court systems and the JMS ecosystem is essential for security and functionality.
- Security risks: Ensuring safety and compliance for both staff and inmates is crucial.
Info-Tech's Approach
Info-Tech's vendor landscape and Jail Management System Vendor Shortlist Tool simplifies JMS selection for government IT leaders:
- Comprehensive vendor assessment: Info-Tech's vendor shortlist tool evaluates features, scalability, and compliance.
- Meeting present and future needs: Systems are selected to fulfill present and upcoming operational requirements.
- Structured evaluations: Reduce risk with an organized approach to system selection, improving safety and global compliance.
Overarching Insight
The careful selection of a JMS is a valuable investment in the future of public safety. By choosing a system that balances efficiency, security, and compliance, government agencies can address growing operational demands while minimizing long-term risks and costs.
Streamlining jail operations with efficient management systems
How Jail Management Systems Improve Operations
JMS are innovative solutions that improve the efficiency of jail operations. They oversee essential tasks such as monitoring inmates, overseeing staff, managing visitors, maintaining facilities, and guaranteeing security (Law Insider). Using cloud technology, JMS provide real time updates and enables facilities to make faster, better decisions.
JMS are adaptable and capable of operating independently or as a component of larger systems like enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, allowing them to meet the increasing demands of jails and advancing correctional facilities. Cloud-based technology allows personnel to access data from anywhere, ensuring seamless operations.
Jails vs. Prisons
Jails and prisons serve as the two primary kinds of correctional institutions in the US
- Jails are managed by local law enforcement and detain individuals before or after their trial or those serving sentences of one year or less. Certain prisons are run by private entities or are jointly managed by different jurisdictions.
- Prisons are administered by state or federal entities, such as the Department of Corrections or the Federal Bureau of Prisons and accommodate offenders serving sentences exceeding one year. Certain prisons are also run by private entities.
JMS can be used in both jails and prisons to improve efficiency, security, and data management.
Global Standardization & Compliance
Governments worldwide are increasingly demanding that jails meet strict standards for data security and inmate management. JMS helps ensure compliance with regulations like Public Safety Canada, Canadian Criminal Justice System (CJS), General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR) and Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS), which are crucial for protecting sensitive data and maintaining public trust.
As jails become more complex, the role of technology is essential in managing larger inmate populations, improving security, and increasing operational efficiency.
JMS vs. Global Recidivism
JMS play a crucial role in public safety by streamlining and securing jail operations. Given that recidivism presents considerable social and economic issues worldwide, efficient jail management is crucial. In 2021, over 10.77 million people were incarcerated, with recidivism rates from 20% to 80%, straining communities and resources (Connell et al., 2023).
A proficient JMS improves jail efficiency and safety, aiding in reduced recidivism rates. By minimizing costs associated with crime, which can be as high as 3% of GDP in certain areas, the appropriate JMS aids IT leaders in enhancing public safety and reducing the social and economic effects of recidivism.
Understanding the importance of effective jail management systems
Scope of the Problem
Jail management is not just about handling inmates. It is about ensuring public safety, protecting sensitive data, and efficiently managing resources. With numerous agencies nationwide, each possessing distinct needs and compliance obligations, the task of selecting the appropriate system is daunting.
One fragile connection in a system can jeopardize security or hinder operations, impacting hundreds of thousands of individuals.
Why This Research Matters
This research offers a definitive roadmap for organizations to prevent expensive errors. Given the multitude of system choices and significant consequences, decision makers require a dependable approach to assess systems according to the most critical factors: security, functionality, and flexibility for future requirements.
Our report and tool ensure that agencies can securely choose a system that will meet their needs both now and in the future.
Cost of Choosing the Wrong System
The costs, both financial and societal, linked to imprisonment are immense. The federal government allocates more than $80 billion each year just for public prisons and jails, with a substantial portion of the budget aimed at operating and assisting these institutions (Prison Policy Initiative). Selecting a subpar JMS not only wastes resources but also neglects to tackle the larger problems of efficiency, safety, and public confidence.
An appropriately selected system can help reduce these costs and aid in creating a more efficient justice system.
Growing global JMS demand
Worldwide, the need for JMS is rising due to several reasons including:
- Rising Inmate Populations: A surge in prison populations necessitates scalable and efficient management systems for effective operational maintenance.
- Public Safety Challenges: As prison populations grow, maintaining safety within facilities becomes more complicated, requiring strong technological assistance.
- Reducing Recidivism: Data-driven rehabilitation programs within JMS decrease recidivism rates and assist inmates in reintegrating into society.
- Modernization Efforts: Governments are revamping outdated jail infrastructure using cutting-edge digital technologies to enhance operational efficiency and strengthen facility resilience.
- Security Gaps: Numerous facilities face challenges due to obsolete technology, hindering their ability to sustain secure environments. Cutting-edge technologies assist in bridging these security gaps.
- Disconnected Systems: Poor coordination between justice and security systems leads to operational delays, emphasizing the necessity for smooth integration across platforms.
- Data Security and Compliance: Correctional facilities are required to follow stringent data security guidelines to safeguard sensitive inmate data and uphold public confidence.
- Cost Reduction: Manual processes lead to elevated costs, and implementing automation in JMS can considerably lower operational expenses.
- AI-Powered Decision-Making: AI and predictive analytics enhance decision-making capabilities, assisting facilities in resource management and predicting inmate behaviors with greater accuracy.
- Scalability and Flexibility: Cloud-based solutions offer real-time access and scalability to meet the needs of expanding inmate populations.
The global demand for JMS is seeing significant expansion, with the market valued at US$756.56 million in 2023. This amount is projected to increase to US$1.04 billion by 2030, reflecting a steady annual compound growth rate (CAGR) of 5.45% over the next seven years.
This growth highlights the rising importance of effective and secure jail management solutions worldwide, as facilities aim to modernize operations, enhance security, and ensure compliance with evolving regulations.
Projected Growth of the Jail Management Software Market, 2023-2030
Source: Verified Market Research, 2024
Key barriers to adopting JMS in jails
Jails worldwide face significant barriers in modernizing their operations. These challenges impede the adoption of advanced JMSs, which are essential for ensuring efficiency, compliance, and public safety (Bureau of Justice Statistics).
| Barriers | Local | Provincial | State | Federal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | Many counties and municipalities fund local jails, making JMS adoption difficult to afford. | Provincial governments manage some jails but often prioritize other sectors over tech upgrades like JMS. | Funding for jails may be included in state budgets, but resources are usually allocated to larger projects. | In contrast to comprehensive tech upgrades, federal grants usually target specific initiatives. |
| Technology Infrastructure | Provincial support for tech upgrades focuses on larger jails, leaving smaller jails unsupported. | Tech infrastructure funding is prioritized for larger prisons, making it difficult for local jails to upgrade. | State governments prioritize larger prisons for tech infrastructure funding, making it hard for local jails to upgrade. | Federal programs can help improve infrastructure, but the aid is often limited and insufficient for full modernization. |
| Data Security | Local jails may struggle in establishing strong cybersecurity measures due to limited IT resources, making data security a concern. | Provincial data security standards exist, but smaller prisons might struggle with the expenses involved in complying with them. | State prisons are required to adhere to cybersecurity standards, but fulfilling these requirements can be costly and complex for smaller facilities. | Federal rules such as CJIS mandate stringent data protection, yet local and regional jails often lack the means to achieve full compliance. |
| Regulatory Compliance | Local jails are required to adhere to provincial or state laws and national regulations, which complicates and increases the cost of JMS compliance. | Provincial rules can differ, and smaller jails might struggle to implement JMS while maintaining compliance. | State regulations can be quite extensive, making it difficult for smaller jails to implement JMS and stay in compliance with all requirements. | Federal regulations add another layer of complexity, especially for small local jails striving to adhere to national standards. |
| Integration with Legacy Systems | Many local jails depend on obsolete systems, making it challenging to integrate JMS, which demands considerable IT assistance. | Provincial facilities might also rely on outdated systems that are difficult to upgrade, delaying JMS adoption. | State-run facilities often face similar issues, with outdated systems that are expensive to integrate with JMS. | Federal facilities may have more advanced systems. However, local and provincial jails often do not take advantage of these developments. |
| Training | Small local jails often lack the staff and resources for training on new JMS systems, making implementation challenging. | Provincial authorities might provide certain training resources, yet smaller corrections facilities may lack reliable assistance. | State-level training programs exist but are usually geared toward larger facilities, resulting in reduced access for smaller jails. | Training supported by federal funds often emphasizes larger state or provincial institutions, often leaving smaller jails with limited assistance. |
Key barriers to adopting JMS in public prisons
Public prisons are entirely owned, managed, and operated by the government. Although the government may outsource and delegate certain services to external firms, it continues to maintain control over the overall operations of public prisons (Bureau of Justice Statistics).
| Barriers | Local | Provincial | State | Federal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bureaucratic Delays | Local public prisons may face less bureaucratic obstacles, yet approvals can still delay critical decisions. | Provincial prisons face bureaucratic delays as decisions must pass through multiple tiers of approval, hindering JMS adoption. | State-run prisons also experience bureaucratic bottlenecks, requiring lengthy approval procedures prior to implementing JMS. | Federal prisons experience the longest delays, as decisions must go through multiple government levels. |
| Limited Budgets | Smaller local public prisons face even tighter budgets, making it harder to afford or fund JMS implementation. | Provincial prisons often operate with limited finances, causing JMS to be a lower priority compared to other needs. | State prisons are similarly constrained by budget limitations, with technological upgrades like JMS often falling behind other priorities. | Federal funds are allocated to other priorities, resulting in insufficient financing for technology upgrades even with increased budgets. |
| Standardized Systems | Local public prisons may have greater flexibility but still need to comply with provincial or state regulations. | Provincial prisons must follow standardized systems, which can be outdated and inflexible, making JMS adoption difficult | State prisons also adhere to standardized systems, often making it difficult to incorporate new JMS solutions. | Federal prisons must adhere to strict national standards, which are often rigid and do not readily allow or easily accommodate JMS upgrades. |
| Resistance to Change | Local prisons, while smaller, may also face resistance against change due to established workflows. | Provincial prison staff and management may oppose to new technology implementations due to established processes, slowing JMS adoption. | State prisons face comparable obstacles, as established systems render the implementation of new technologies such as JMS difficult. | Federal prisons tend to exhibit the greatest resistance, with long-standing systems and processes that evolve slowly over time. |
Key barriers to adopting JMS in private prisons
In contrast, private prisons are managed by third-party firms that the government employs via contracts. These companies independently own, manage, and operate the prisons (Bureau of Justice Statistics).
| Barriers | Provincial | State | Federal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit-Driven Focus | Private prisons under provincial contracts prioritize profitability, and JMS adoption is considered when it reduces expenses or enhances efficiency. | Private prisons under state contracts similarly prioritize profit, adopting JMS when it aligns with cost-saving strategies. | Private prisons under federal contracts function similarly, prioritizing profit-driven decisions for technology upgrades. |
| Short-Term Contracts | Private prisons with short-term provincial contracts are less inclined to invest in long-term solutions such as JMS due to the unpredictability of contract renewals. | Short-term state contracts likewise discourage private prisons from heavily investing in JMS without assurance of future contracts. | Federal contracts may be short-term as well, rendering JMS investments hazardous without guarantees of contract extensions or renewals. |
| Less Oversight | Private prisons might experience minimal oversight from provincial governments, thereby decreasing the necessity to implement JMS unless mandated by contract. | State contracts often provide less oversight, so JMS adoption is often delayed unless clearly required. | Private prisons with federal contracts may encounter reduced oversight, leading to delayed JMS adoption unless necessary for compliance. |
JMS will improve services and combat challenges
Core components of a JMS are important to assess system capabilities
Info-Tech Insight
IT leaders should use a dynamic evaluation framework that prioritizes future-proofing when selecting a JMS. This includes assessing the system's capacity to adjust to regulatory
modifications, accommodate inmate populations, and integrate with court systems, ensuring the solution's durability over time.
| Data Protection & Compliance | Technology Infrastructure | Operational Tasks | Inmate Data Management |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Data Encryption: Safeguards confidential inmate information. Access Control: Limits system access according to user roles. Compliance: Adheres to governmental regulations. Incident Reporting: Automatically records inmate and security violations. |
Cloud Computing: Allows instantaneous access to and storage of data. Mobile Applications: Allows staff to
oversee tasks, monitor inmate activities, and
AI & Machine Learning: Streamlines repetitive RFID Tracking: Monitors inmate movement |
Administrative Assistance: Automates daily
staff operations like inmate tracking,
healthcare appointments, and court date
Data Reporting: Generates insights and
reports to assist administrators in
Self-Managed Systems: Reduces the need for manual intervention by managing inmate movements, security logs, and communication |
Automated Admin Tasks: Automates
fundamental tasks like inmate booking and
inventory management.
Inmate Data Analysis: Analyzes data for decision-making on resource distribution, parole management, and behavioral monitoring. Behavioral Predictions: Predicts risks using AI-powered insights or recognizes recidivism risks based on inmate data. |
Integrated Facility Operations |
|||
|
System Connectivity: Operates and synchronizes within a broader ecosystem, including law enforcement databases, courts, and parole systems, ensuring seamless communication across all departments. Remote Monitoring: Provides access for on-the-go monitoring and management via secure mobile devices. Centralized Data Hub: Securely stores and manages all inmate-related data within a secure facility to ensure inmate data is centralized and protected. |
|||
The JMS ecosystem
Acquire a thorough understanding of your facility's JMS ecosystem prior to assessing solutions. It is essential to recognize specific requirements and infrastructure to ensure the JMS solution integrates smoothly with all operational and security systems across the organization.
Address all components of the JMS capabilities
JMS's improve data security and compliance via encryption, access controls, and automated incident reporting. Utilizing cloud-based technology and AI-driven automation, JMS facilitates effective inmate tracking, resource management, and behavioral analysis, optimizing daily operations. Integrated systems offer remote monitoring and centralized data storage to ensure smooth facility operations and real-time data accessibility.
Info-Tech
Insight
The Jail Management System Vendor Shortlist Tool empowers IT leaders to prioritize evaluation criteria to their unique operational needs. This approach improves the relevance of vendor selection while ensuring shortlisted systems are strategically aligned with organizational objectives, driving effective decision-making and long-term success.
Deliver effective jail management with the right JMS
The Challenges
- The need to adapt JMS to comply with evolving regulations and data protection requirements.
- Ensuring seamless compatibility with judicial systems, law enforcement databases, and other critical infrastructure.
- Limited funding impacting the ability to select scalable and secure JMS solutions.
- Selecting a JMS that remains relevant with advancing technology and facility needs.
- Pressure to improve efficiency in inmate management, staff workflows, and resource allocation.
- Rising concerns over protecting sensitive inmate information from cyberthreats.
The Solution
Choosing the best vendor with a structured approach
The Info-Tech approach to JMS vendor selection ensures a structured and efficient process, focusing on key criteria that minimize risks and future-proof your system. By following this methodology, organizations can make informed decisions that align with long-term operational goals.
Structured, Informed Decision-Making
Ensures a comprehensive evaluation of all vendors, focusing on critical criteria such as security, scalability, and compliance. This approach helps to avoid the risk of rushed decisions, operational dysfunction and inefficiencies, and noncompliance with the required standards.
Streamlined and Risk-Reducing Process
The Info-Tech approach streamlines the selection process by prioritizing compliance checks and focusing on high impact features, saving time, and reducing the risk of costly errors, data breaches, or regulatory penalties.
Long-Term Scalability & Future-Proofing
Aligns vendor selection with future operational growth and evolving needs to ensure that the JMS can scale to meet future demands and remain compliant with changing regulations.
JMS provides benefits for IT within government agencies
IT Benefits
Improved Efficiency: Automation of inmate booking and cell assignments improves operational speed and reduces errors.
Enhanced Security: Biometric identification such as fingerprint and facial recognition as a method of identification ensures secure tracking and access control.
Cost Savings: Automations reduce numerous manual tasks and paper-based processes, saving costs in the long run.
Improved Data Management: Integrated system platforms ensure that inmate information is easily accessible and reportable.
Leverage AI Utilization: AI integration streamlines operations, boosting overall process efficiency.
Enhanced Communication: Messaging systems and video conferencing enhances communication between staff and the inmates.
Global Government Benefits Across All Levels
Enhanced Security: Prevents unauthorized access of contraband smuggling and ensures accurate inmate tracking, improving public safety.
Cost Savings: Reduces reliance on physical documentation and manual labor, saving government resources.
Streamlined Communication: Facilitates smooth interaction between staff, inmates, and relevant government agencies, improving coordination.
Informed Decision-Making: Comprehensive data analytics and AI provide government leaders with actionable insights, leading to help leaders make informed policy decisions.
Rehabilitation Efforts: AI-driven systems support rehabilitation initiatives and projects, improving the quality of life and outcomes for prisoners while the tendency to reoffend is reduced.
Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs
DIY Toolkit
"Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."
Guided Implementation
"Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."
Workshop
"We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."
Executive & Technical Counseling
"Our team and processes are maturing; however, to expedite the journey we'll need a seasoned practitioner to coach and validate approaches, deliverables, and opportunities."
Consulting
"Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."
Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all five options.
Mi-Case modernizes inmate management systems (AIMS)
Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation & Reentry (ADCRR) upgrades its legacy system with Mi-Case on AWS
USE CASES
Inmate Tracking
Mobile-based Operations
Challenge
The Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation & Reentry (ADCRR) needed to upgrade its outdated Arizona Correctional Information System (ACIS) as it was unable to manage over 34,000 inmates and 4,000 parolees. The legacy system, implemented decades ago, was ineffective and unable to support modern offender management needs such as inmate tracking, financial records, and real-time reporting. ADCRR sought a cloud-ready, mobile-enabled, and scalable system to handle growing demands for improved security, programming, and reporting.
Solution
ADCRR collaborated with Mi-Case to implement Mi-Case's cloud-based Offender Management System on Amazon Web Services. This solution included over 20 modules for inmate management, from intake through release and provided real-time reporting, sentence calculation, and tailored programming. Mi-Case delivered a fully mobile and configurable system that met state-specific legal requirements, empowering officers and case managers with data-driven decision-making tools and reducing recidivism.
Results
- Improved operational efficiency with real-time data access and mobile capabilities.
- Reduced recidivism by improving inmate programming and management.
-
Enhanced decision-making for officers and case managers through better access to offender data.
- Seamless transition to modern technology with ongoing support and local techs, ensuring a smooth implementation and continuous updates.
INDUSTRY
Correctional Services
SOURCE
"Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation & Reentry," Mi-Case, 2019
PremierOne Jail revolutionizes Saginaw County's public safety operations
Saginaw County utilizes PremierOne Jail to modernize records and inmate management, enhancing operational efficiency.
USE CASES
Inmate Tracking & Risk Assessment
Real-Time Data Sharing
Challenge
The Saginaw County Sheriff's Office needed an effective method to share essential law enforcement data across regional agencies. Outdated systems were inefficient, expensive, and inadequate for supporting modern multi-agency operations. The requirements for managing inmate data efficiently and sharing information securely across counties and improve collaboration with neighboring public safety agencies were critical.
Solution
Saginaw County adopted the cloud-based PremierOne Jail system, integrated with the PremierOne Records system, to manage inmate booking, detention, and historical data management. This solution enabled seamless data sharing across 54 agencies, reducing costs by 75% and enhancing cross-agency collaboration. The shared model eliminated infrastructure expenses and provided comprehensive data on inmates, including risk assessments and historical records to support informed decision-making.
Results
Reduced Costs: Reduced annual maintenance costs by 75% for participating agencies.
Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Smooth integration of jail and records data allowed real-time information of inmate movements and improved risk assessments while coordinating operations.
Improved Collaboration: Agencies across the region can now access critical data in real time, enhancing investigation capabilities and operational coordination.
Increased Safety: Officers benefit from situational awareness provided by the integrated system, which identifies high-risk individuals and helps to make more informed and adequate decisions.
INDUSTRY
Correctional Services
SOURCE
"PremierOne Jail," Motorola Solutions, 2016
Identify the right JMS vendors with Info-Tech's vendor landscape
Vendors assessed for core functionality and solutions suited to any jail organization.
ATIMS
Offers jail management software that simplifies inmate tracking and facility management for correctional institutions.
Beacon Software Solutions
Provides comprehensive public safety and law enforcement software designed to enhance efficiency and reporting.
Black Creek Integrated Systems Corp.
Develops advanced security and jail management solutions, integrating technology for corrections and law enforcement.
Bosch Security and Safety Systems
A global leader in providing security, safety, and communication solutions for public safety sectors.
Caliber Public Safety
Delivers software for law enforcement agencies, including records management and jail management systems.
CentralSquare
Offers public sector software for managing public safety, including CAD, records management, and analytics.
Chetu World-Class Software Solutions
Provides custom software development services across a variety of industries, including public safety and criminal justice.
Eagle Advantage Solutions, Inc. (EAS)
Specializes in software solutions for law enforcement, including jail management and records management systems.
eForce Software
Offers cloud-based public safety software, including dispatch, records management, and jail management.
EIS
Provides versatile jail management software solutions tailored for county and municipal detention centers.
Enterpol by Huber & Associates
A software platform designed for public safety, offering solutions like CAD, mobile data, and records management.
GeoConex
Offers public safety software solutions for 911 dispatch, records management, and jail management.
Global Public Safety
Provides technology and equipment for law enforcement and public safety, including data management systems.
Intellitech Corporation
Develops specialized software solutions for law enforcement and criminal justice agencies.
JailTracker
A comprehensive jail management software that helps streamline inmate tracking and facility management processes.
Justice Solutions
Delivers public safety and justice technology solutions focused on improving efficiency and case management.
Marquis Software
Specializes in correctional management software for state and local government agencies.
Mi-Case
Provides case management and decision support software for criminal justice and public safety agencies.
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
A global leader in mission-critical communications, video security, and public safety technology.
Omnigo
Delivers software solutions for law enforcement, healthcare, and public safety to improve incident reporting and management.
SmartCOP
Provides integrated software solutions for law enforcement, fire, and emergency services, including records and jail management.
Sun Ridge Systems, Inc.
Offers comprehensive jail management and public safety software for law enforcement agencies.
Tyler Technologies
Provides integrated software and technology services to improve the efficiency and transparency of public sector operations.
UNIT Innovations
Specializes in configurable jail management systems with mobile technology and real-time integration.
365LABS
Builds modern software solutions for public safety and criminal justice organizations, leveraging cloud and AI technology for law enforcement agencies.
About Info-Tech
Info-Tech Research Group is the world’s fastest-growing information technology research and advisory company, proudly serving over 30,000 IT professionals.
We produce unbiased and highly relevant research to help CIOs and IT leaders make strategic, timely, and well-informed decisions. We partner closely with IT teams to provide everything they need, from actionable tools to analyst guidance, ensuring they deliver measurable results for their organizations.
What Is a Blueprint?
A blueprint is designed to be a roadmap, containing a methodology and the tools and templates you need to solve your IT problems.
Each blueprint can be accompanied by a Guided Implementation that provides you access to our world-class analysts to help you get through the project.
Talk to an Analyst
Our analyst calls are focused on helping our members use the research we produce, and our experts will guide you to successful project completion.
Book an Analyst Call on This Topic
You can start as early as tomorrow morning. Our analysts will explain the process during your first call.
Get Advice From a Subject Matter Expert
Each call will focus on explaining the material and helping you to plan your project, interpret and analyze the results of each project step, and set the direction for your next project step.
Unlock Sample ResearchContributors
- Bernard Malkov, IT Operations Director, Lake County Sherriff’s Office
