ManageEngine OpManager

What differentiates ManageEngine OpManager from other similar products?

Many companies want to manage their IT environment with a minimal amount of support personnel. Our business is not an exception. A reliable monitoring system that will automatically alert you before an issue gets critical is essential for this to function. In this regard, OpManager has been quite helpful. Without manually logging in and checking for issues, we can monitor a lot of systems. OpManager, on the other hand, alerts us when an issue is developing and gives us the opportunity to respond before it affects our end users.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

OpManager is a very effective monitoring solution that is reasonably priced. Almost any device that supports SNMP or WMI can be monitored by it. In order to monitor both the virtualization host and the virtual computers that are being hosted, it also offers native support for vSphere. It has broad built-in monitoring capabilities for a variety of servers, operating systems, network infrastructure devices, and server-based applications.

What do you dislike most about this product?

When you allow it to automatically set up what it discovers after scanning across a variety of network addresses, it can be a little confusing. For some devices that can be monitored in a variety of ways, it might choose the incorrect monitoring profile. For instance, it might set up an Exchange server or an Active Directory Domain Controller as a standard Windows server. When this occurs, you must explicitly add the device as the type of server you wish to monitor by deleting the device that OpManager had put up.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

You can get a trial version of OpManager to test it out in your environment. To add servers and network infrastructure devices, use the automatic scan approach. However, for servers, you might need to go in after the event and manually re-add the device with the kind of profile you want the server monitored.

What differentiates ManageEngine OpManager from other similar products?

Something that I really like is that if you don`t know how to configure Netflow in your router, OpManager can do it for you, just provide OpManager with the device credentials and it will take care of that with zero complications.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

I have been using the ManageEngine company's extremely potent monitoring software, OpManager, for three years. It offers a lot of monitoring features and tools, and I linked it with the ManageEngine ServiceDesk desk plus to open tickets automatically when alarms are received. When critical or failed servers, services, URLs, processes, or network devices occur, you can be notified through email or SMS. A powerful dashboard for monitoring is available. There are numerous add-ons, including NetFlow and application monitoring.

What do you dislike most about this product?

I'm not sure if it doesn't exist, but I can't seem to find a way to automatically back up the OpManager settings. They have a process that is described on their website, but it must be done by hand and has room for human mistakes. The next releases need to enhance or include that feature.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

OpManager allows us to monitor any alarm on all of our physical and virtual servers, regardless of the operating system that is in use. OpManager only needs the credentials for the machine or device in question, and you can start seeing pertinent information about your environment within a few minutes.

What differentiates ManageEngine OpManager from other similar products?

The ability to keep an eye on the servers we are launching has been incredibly helpful in allowing us to undertake thorough performance monitoring, in-depth network analysis, and high-quality work.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Monitoring has a fantastic UI with very comprehensive capabilities and very consistent performance. The monitoring and monitoring reports appear to be of the highest caliber, to be highly accurate, and consistently excellent. It typically features tools up to par with the standards and characteristics needed to operate the software correctly.

What do you dislike most about this product?

The detailed configuration involved in monitoring the first data makes the monitoring process somewhat difficult. It takes some effort to fully comprehend everything.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

It is a really good, practical, and great piece of software to use when monitoring data. It is quite helpful to comprehend the issues that you may be attempting to resolve.