- Analysts cannot monitor and track events coming from multiple tools because they have no visibility into the threat environment.
- Incident management takes away time from problem management because processes are ad hoc and the continuous monitoring, collection, and analysis of massive volumes of security event data is responsive rather than tactical.
- Organizations are struggling to defend against and prevent threats while juggling business, compliance, and consumer obligations.
Our Advice
Critical Insight
- Security operations is no longer a center but a process. The need for a physical security hub has evolved into the virtual fusion of prevention, detection, analysis, and response efforts. When all four functions operate as a unified process, your organization will be able to proactively combat changes in the threat landscape.
- Raw data without correlation is a waste of time, money, and effort. A SIEM on its own will not provide this contextualization and needs configuration. Prevention, detection, analysis, and response processes must contextualize threat data and supplement one another – true value will only be realized once all four functions operate as a unified process.
- If you are not communicating, then you are not secure. Collaboration eliminates siloed decisions by connecting people, processes, and technologies. You leave less room for error, consume fewer resources, and improve operational efficiency with a transparent security operations process.
Impact and Result
- A centralized security operations process actively transforms security events and threat information into actionable intelligence, driving security prevention, detection, analysis, and response processes that address the increasing sophistication of cyberthreats while guiding continuous improvement.
- This blueprint will walk through the steps of developing a flexible and systematic security operations program relevant to your organization.
Member Testimonials
After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve. See our top member experiences for this blueprint and what our clients have to say.
9.5/10
Overall Impact
$80,487
Average $ Saved
58
Average Days Saved
Client
Experience
Impact
$ Saved
Days Saved
LSU AgCenter
Guided Implementation
10/10
N/A
50
Best parts: Knowledgeable and friendly expert, streamlined process, great pre-built tools Worst part: Realizing how much work we have to do to get... Read More
Ministry of Industry, Innovation, Science and Technology
Guided Implementation
10/10
$137K
120
This analyst call has given me the confidence that our Ministry can accomplish the rollout of this task if the resources are allocated to it. I do ... Read More
Marshall University
Guided Implementation
8/10
$13,700
10
The analyst is very knowledgable and great to work with. The worst part is the challenge of time management on our side of not currently having the... Read More
Chemeketa Community College
Workshop
10/10
$102K
60
Best - plan developed with deliverables, communication flow between two teams, discussion of current state. discussion of issues between the two ma... Read More
State of Kansas Human Services
Workshop
10/10
$68,500
50
Victor Okorie was quite extraordinary in so many ways. Not only did he bring in the stellar technical skills and very mature operational experience... Read More
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Workshop
9/10
N/A
N/A
Once we make adjustments where needed, i believe we should save time and money, but I don't know exactly what those numbers look like. I thoug... Read More
Ailos Central Credit Cooperative
Guided Implementation
10/10
$100K
80
The best part is the follow-up given by the analyst Shastri during the steps we planned. The worst part was working in splited time, we could not ... Read More
Virginia Department of Taxation
Workshop
10/10
$12,599
5
Messer
Guided Implementation
8/10
$30,999
20
The best part was listening and learning fro Shastri who has great experience in what I need to do. Nothing bad to report except now I have a lot o... Read More
Portland Community College
Guided Implementation
9/10
N/A
5
Marc addressed the core questions we had and suggested some productive follow ups. Our main goal was just to have a "sounding board" for the work w... Read More
Workshop: Build Your Security Operations Program From the Ground Up
Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.
Module 1: Establish your foundation
The Purpose
- Identify security obligations and the security operations program’s pressure posture.
- Assess current people, process, and technology capabilities.
- Determine foundational controls and complete system and asset inventory.
Key Benefits Achieved
- Identified the foundational elements needed for planning before a security operations program can be built
Activities
Outputs
Define workshop objectives and current state of knowledge.
Define security obligations and assess security pressure posture.
Determine current knowledge and skill gaps.
Identify services worth monitoring.
Document roles and responsibilities.
Assess and document scope & boundaries (your information system environment).
- Security Pressure Analysis tool
- Security Operations RACI tool
Module 2: Security operations capability gap analysis
The Purpose
- Identify the maturity level of existing security operations program processes.
Key Benefits Achieved
- Current maturity assessment of security operations processes
Activities
Outputs
Assess current maturity of security operations capabilities and processes.
Determine appropriate target state for security operations.
Identify and document gap closure initiatives.
- Gap analysis and gap closure initiatives documented in Security Operations Roadmap tool
Module 3: Security operations capability gap analysis (continued)
The Purpose
- Design your optimized target state.
- Improve your security operations processes with governance and policy solutions.
- Identify and prioritize gap initiatives.
Key Benefits Achieved
- A comprehensive list of initiatives to reach ideal target state
- Optimized security operations with repeatable and standardized policies
Activities
Outputs
Assess current maturity of security operations capabilities and processes.
Determine appropriate target state for security operations.
Identify and document gap closure initiatives.
- Gap analysis and gap closure initiatives documented in Security Operations Roadmap tool
Module 4: Develop an implementation roadmap
The Purpose
- Formalize project strategy with a project charter.
- Determine your sourcing strategy for in-house or outsourced security operations processes.
- Assign responsibilities and complete an implementation roadmap.
Key Benefits Achieved
- An overarching and documented strategy and vision for your security operations
- A thorough rationale for in-house or outsourced security operations processes
- Assigned and documented responsibilities for key projects
Activities
Outputs
Prioritize gap closure initiatives based on cost/benefit and dependencies.
Construct prioritized roadmap of initiatives organized into execution waves.
Determine in-house vs. outsourcing rationale.
Reassess RACI chart.
- Prioritized roadmap of initiatives
- Security Operations communication deck
- In-house vs. outsourcing rationale (*optional/time permitting)
- Security operations metrics summary (*optional/time permitting)