- Failing to present the board with clear metrics and improvement plans can have a significant impact on a leader's career.
- Measuring metrics not aligned with revenue goals hinders a software startup's growth and success.
- Lack of shared goals and metrics hinders data-driven decision making.
- Leaders need reliable metrics to improve processes.
Our Advice
Critical Insight
This SoftwareReviews blueprint provides the guidance and tools required to implement a key metrics approach, resulting in getting to scale faster. Key steps for success include:
- Establishing benchmarks in front-office operations.
- Educating stakeholders on the importance of the right metrics.
- Evaluating against benchmarks and establishing a link between key metrics and processes.
- Setting realistic goals for functional leaders for improvement and aligning with the CEO's goals.
- Measuring the impact of changes, adjusting improvement goals, and communicating progress.
Impact and Result
Instill confidence in leadership among investors, the board, and employees through a demonstrated ability to bring operations back on track as indicated by key metrics.
Optimize the Right Metrics to Scale Your Business
Tech CEOs will accelerate at-scale attainment with the right front-office metrics, innovative problem solving, and continuous improvement.
Analyst Perspective
Optimize the right metrics to scale your business
Our business-to-business (B2B) software startup research shows CEOs need a roadmap to get to scale. While investment dollars are available to startups, the monies will go to companies where revenue growth, scalability, and eventually earnings are most predictable. Predictable growth is hard-won and often starts with a trajectory that is anything but smooth. Leaders need coaching, the right talent, a solid set of key metrics, and a problem-solving culture to get to scale. However, the challenges can be daunting.
Startup leaders often miss key metrics that diagnose hidden flaws, or they fail to align stakeholders on fundamentals such as strong product-market fit, deep buyer understanding, or a focus on customer value delivery. What's needed, from a front-office perspective, is a set of metrics that can give CEOs the insight into whether they are moving successfully from early-stage through mid-stage to at-scale. Failing to measure in this fashion will result in difficult board and investor conversations, and a lot (including careers!) is at stake.
Our research finds that successful startup CEOs align stakeholders on the right metrics throughout the early-stage to at-scale journey. They lead problem-solving efforts when metrics were off track and executed playbooks with experienced staff to remediate issues and accelerate success. Our blueprint documents this process, provides you with software industry front-office benchmarks, and points to playbooks contained in our library that will help plug gaps, get you to scale, and keep your investors satisfied.
Jeff Golterman
Managing Director
SoftwareReviews Advisory
Shashi Bellamkonda
Principal Research Director
SoftwareReviews Advisory
Executive Summary
Your Challenge | Common Obstacles | SoftwareReviews’ Approach |
Startup CEOs seeking to optimize around the ideal set of metrics and build the organizational capabilities to drive ongoing improvement will face the following challenges:
|
When changing how the business is measured, CEOs will encounter the following obstacles:
|
This SoftwareReviews blueprint covers the following steps to achieve at-scale success:
|
SoftwareReviews Insight
Startup leaders need to align executive and functional objectives, continually measure performance against key metrics, and build a problem-solving culture to drive continuous improvement and confidence in leadership among investors, the board, and employees.
Metrics are many - our focus here is on the front office
The scale-up journey calls for optimizing many metrics. This blueprint is focused on customer, sales, and marketing.
This blueprint's focus:
Revenue metrics
Metrics impacting new revenue, sales, marketing, and conversions
Retention metrics
Customer success metrics that impact retention and revenue from existing customers
Front Office - Sales, Marketing, and Customer Success
Will be covered in future research:
Cash flow metrics
Profitability, cash flow, burn rate, and cash runway
Product metrics
Product usage, monthly active users (MAU), adoption rate
Pricing metrics
Gross margin, operating margin, and net profit margin
"Use actionable metrics and throw out the ones that only make you feel good. If metrics do not suggest actionable strategies, they are not worth your time and effort."
- Kim Christian Hvidkjaer, serial entrepreneur, author, and investor
Your job is on the line
Your change management program to get to scale will bring huge benefits:
- Aligning the CEO and the leadership team on goals
- Increasing the pace of getting to scale
- Enabling fact- and data-driven decision making
- Giving reliable ability to measure the key metrics
- Demonstrating management prowess to the board
"If you can get 1% better each day for one year, you'll end up 37 times better by the end of the year."
- James Clear, Author of Atomic Habits
Expect challenges
Leaders driving the change management required to get to scale will have to overcome key challenges.
- Board reporting takes too long and confidence in the numbers is weak - Without clear metrics and improvement plans ready to activate, boards suspect leadership may need upgrading.
- Misalignment between CEO and key staff - This is evident when teams lack documented goals and objectives that align with what's mission critical to the CEO. If staff members can't articulate how their objectives are aligned with the CEO, there are flaws in the annual goal-setting process.
- Key metrics (revenue, retention, growth) are frequently suboptimized - This is because a more detailed set of underlying metrics linked to processes haven't been established. Revenue growth at all costs may lead to suboptimized customer retention, for example. Another example is how poor-quality leads result in wasted sales resources, lower win rates, and higher costs per lead. Leaders recognize that second- and sometimes third-level metrics that contribute to key metric attainment may be missing.
- Balance between agility and fact-based approaches in decision making - A lack of metric alignment or supporting data capture and measurement systems can impede progress and lead to delays in making critical business decisions. Gut feel and intuition-based decision making creep in and destroy scale and repeatability. Leaders know how to strike a balance.
- Discord - Discord among staff arises with the inevitable conflict between the fact-based decision makers and "seat of the pants" staff and leadership. If old-line leadership fails to adopt measurement and reporting methods that drive scale, CEOs will face significant gaps in decision making and will need to make the tough decisions to move those that don't get it out of the business.
"By tracking key metrics, SaaS companies can identify areas where they are growing and areas where they are generating profits. This information can be used to make better decisions about pricing, product development, and marketing. Ultimately, this can lead to a higher valuation for the company."
- David Skok, Managing General Partner, Matrix Partners
Front-office metric focus varies as you scale up
Metric emphasis shifts as your company scales. CEOs, even those at-scale, will ensure the foundational metrics, typically associated with early stage, are being optimized.
As you get to scale... | ...and build essential company capabilities... | ...key metrics will vary! | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get to scale At-scale |
|
Invest in sales and marketing wisely Sales & marketing expense ratio |
Enable a high seller %; attain high quota % Sales quota attainment ratio |
Drive new ARR vs. retention losses SaaS quick ratio |
|
Build on foundational success Mid-stage |
|
Manage customer acquisition costs New CAC ratio |
Drive acceptable CAC payback period CAC payback period |
Drive expansion growth after retention losses Net revenue retention |
Enable expansion growth as a high % of total growth New vs. expansion ARR mix |
Execute on the fundamentals Early-stage |
|
Close a high % of sales opportunities Win rate |
Satisfy customers NPS |
Have high % of customers renew Gross revenue retention |
Drive growth in existing customers New + expansion ARR growth rate |
Strengthen fundamental capabilities
Before optimizing metrics against early-stage benchmarks, CEOs will work with their functional leaders to ensure key foundational capabilities are in place.
When in early-stage, have you...
- Established a clear measure of competitive differentiation?
- Established a well-defined brand strategy?
- Built products based on documented buyer personas and buyer-defined definitions of value?
- Defined product leadership in your market(s)?
- Established an effective social presence? Lead gen engine?
- Established an effective overall sales-tech enabled sales/channel motion? Pricing strategy?
- Built a website and content marketing focused on buyer value (vs. features)?
- Developed a customer success strategy to maximize customer satisfaction?
- Implemented an effective sales and marketing automation platform?
Members can use the research and analyst guidance behind SoftwareReviews' Technology Marketing Management (TMM) Framework to optimize key processes and improve metrics throughout their scale-up journey.
Regardless of current size, optimize early-stage metrics: Win rates
Sales win rate is one of the most important metrics. Wins indicates the volume of prospect engagement and overall demand for your solution, the strength of your product/market fit, and sales effectiveness.
Key metric: Win rate
Early-stage <$10M ARR |
Close a high % of sales opportunities Win rate |
Satisfy customers NPS |
Have high % of customers renew Gross revenue retention |
Drive growth in existing customers New + expansion ARR growth rate |
New logos: Should be within the range of 20% to 40%.
Upsell/cross-sell in existing accounts: Should be higher and within the 40% to 85% range, showing buyers want more of what you are offering. Combined win rates should be around 30%. If win rate is above 40%:
|
Definition: How successful Sales is at turning sales opportunities into sales.
Measured: $ opportunities won / ($ value of opportunities won + $ lost) |
|||
At-scale $100M ARR |
20% to 22% | |||
Mid-stage $10M to $100M ARR |
20% to 40% | |||
Early-stage <$10M ARR |
20% to 40% |
Pipeline coverage ratio
Definition: How large your pipeline of opportunities needs to be per your win rate.
Measured: 1/win rate. If your win rate is 20%, you need five opportunities identified for every one won.
TMM Framework links:
- Lead Gen, SEM & Paid Advertising: Diagnose an out-of-date buyer persona or inaccurate ICP.
- Product Pricing & Packaging: Determine if offerings are accurately priced to take full advantage of the market opportunity.
- Sales Data & Technologies: Identify opportunities to free up sellers for more selling activities.
- Website Design, SEO & Conversion; Social Media Strategies; Marketing Automation Tools: Excel at lead gen engine basics to both generate leads and take burden off sellers.
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Customer satisfaction is best measured using a Net Promoter Score (NPS) and should be measured at least once annually throughout your scale-up journey. Our research shows the delivery of customer value correlates highest to strong NPS.
Key metrics: Net promoter score (NPS)
Early-stage <$10M ARR |
Close a high % of sales opportunities Win rate |
Satisfy customers NPS |
Have high % of customers renew Gross revenue retention |
Drive growth in existing customers New + expansion ARR growth rate |
NPS: A measure of customer satisfaction and a proxy for willingness to renew. For startups, an NPS of 30% to 50% is strong and over 50% is exceptional. The most accurate scores are based on surveying a broad distribution of customers vs. known favorites/promoters.
If you are a members of SoftwareReviews Advisory with adequate reviews, you can contact your account team for your scores. |
Definition: % of customers that would recommend, using a scale of 1-10, vs. detractors; 9-10 are promoters, 7-8 are neutral, and 0-6 are detractors.
Measured: % Promoters - % Detractors Customer satisfaction: |
|||
Exceptional | > 50% | |||
Strong | 30% to 50% | |||
Fair | 0% to 30% | |||
Poor | < 0% |
Remedies: NPS scores lower than benchmark signal customer dissatisfaction in a key area. Our research, however, shows a lack of customer value as the #1 contributor to low NPS scores.
TMM Framework links:
- Customer Satisfaction & NPS; CX Data & Technologies: Capture customer NPS scores annually and learn which features and capabilities have the highest NPS correlation.
- Brand Strategy & Identity; Brand Equity, Awareness & Performance: Budget and build for brand strategy and awareness. Buyers want to buy from and customers want to stay with strong brands.
- Internal & External Communication: Ensure investors, analysts, and influencers hear your voice to grow mindshare.